4.4 Article

Coexisting vascular lesions in reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome

Journal

CEPHALALGIA
Volume 37, Issue 1, Pages 29-35

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/0333102416637826

Keywords

Cerebral vasoconstriction; cerebral vasculitis; thunderclap headache; aneurysm; cervical artery dissection; vascular malformation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The pathophysiology of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is not known. Published cases have documented coexisting cervical artery dissection and unruptured aneurysms, raising the possibility that ultrastructural vessel wall abnormalities underlie the development of vascular lesions as well as RCVS. Methods: In this retrospective study we compared the frequency of neurovascular abnormalities in 158 consecutive RCVS patients, 44 patients with primary angiitis of the central nervous system (PACNS, positive controls), and 177 non-stroke patients with acute neurological symptoms (non-arteriopathy controls). Results: Coexisting neurovascular abnormalities were significantly higher (p<0.001) in RCVS (23%) as compared to the PACNS (5%) or non-arteriopathy groups (8%). Cervical artery dissections were noted only in the RCVS group (8%, p<0.001). The RCVS group had more unruptured aneurysms than PACNS (13% vs. 5%, p = 0.099) or non-arteriopathy controls (13% vs. 7%, p = 0.05). Seven RCVS patients also had other vascular malformations (venous anomaly, cavernous malformations, fibromuscular dysplasia). There was no significant association between coexisting vascular abnormalities and brain lesions or discharge clinical outcome in the RCVS group. Conclusion: The high prevalence and heterogeneous anatomy of coexisting vascular lesions suggest that subtle ultrastructural arterial wall abnormalities may contribute to their development and also predispose to RCVS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available