4.6 Article

A 'Common Food Policy' for Europe: How governance reforms can spark a shift to healthy diets and sustainable food systems

Journal

FOOD POLICY
Volume 96, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodpol.2020.101849

Keywords

Food policy; Policy integration; Common food policy; Governance; Food and agriculture; Health

Funding

  1. Carasso Foundation
  2. Fondation Charles Leopold Mayer pour le Progres de l'Homme (FPH)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

More than half of adults in the European Union (EU) are now either overweight or obese (53%). Non-communicable diseases (NCDs), many of which are diet-related, account for 70% of mortality in Europe and a growing share of healthcare costs. While eating habits have an important role to play in NCD prevention, consumption patterns across the EU are diverging significantly from recommended diets. There is growing consensus on the solution: a series of coordinated and wide-ranging policy interventions to build healthy 'food environments'. This article argues that EU governance structures remain ill-adapted to the systemic nature of this and other challenges in food systems (e.g. climate change, biodiversity loss, food poverty): conflicting objectives and missed synergies are identified between different policy areas (agriculture, trade, health, environment, etc.) and between different levels of governance (EU, national, local). An integrated food policy framework - a 'Common Food Policy' - is therefore required to meet the EU's public health and sustainability objectives. It identifies four distinct aspects of the governance shift required to promote healthy diets and build sustainable food systems in Europe: (i) coherence across policy areas; (ii) coherence across governance levels; (iii) governance for transition; and (iv) food democracy. Blueprints for a Common Food Policy are already emerging, and are ripe for consideration, development, and implementation by the European institutions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available