4.7 Article

Changes of the bacterial community diversity on chicken carcasses through an Australian poultry processing line

Journal

FOOD MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 86, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2019.103350

Keywords

Poultry; Processing; Bacteria; 16S amplicon; Microbiome; Food safety

Funding

  1. Strategic Innovative Projects program from Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Australia [R-10150-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Understanding the bacterial community profile through poultry processing could help the industry to produce better poultry products. In this study, 10 chicken carcasses were randomly sampled from before and after scalding, before and after immersion chilling, and after air chilling each through a modern commercial processing line, along with the contents of 10 caeca. The sampled processing line effectively reduced the bacterial counts by > 4.6 Log(10) CFU/ml for each of Total Viable Counts, Escherichia coli and Campylobacter. However, the metagenomics results suggested that Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus and unclassified Lachnospiraceae persisted at all sampling stages. Pseudomonas, Paeniglutamicibacter, Chryseobacterium and Pseudarthrobacter comprised 47.2% in the bacterial community on samples after air chilling compared to 0.3% on samples after immersion chilling, whereas TVCs were the same. Overall, the current interventions of the investigated poultry processing line were unable to eliminate persistence of certain foodborne pathogens, despite a significant reduction of the overall bacterial counts. Chilling is an important controlling point in contamination/cross-contamination, particularly extended air chilling. Lastly, the large presence of Pseudomonas on chickens after air chilling may lead to downstream spoilage related issues, which needs more investigation to explore quantitatively the effect on the shelf life of poultry products.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available