4.5 Article

Preparation and Characterization of PLA Film/3D Printing Composite Scaffold for Tissue Engineering Application

Journal

FIBERS AND POLYMERS
Volume 21, Issue 4, Pages 709-716

Publisher

KOREAN FIBER SOC
DOI: 10.1007/s12221-020-9305-1

Keywords

PLA film; 3D printing technology; Composite scaffold; Mechanical properties; Tissue engineering

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Sci-Tech University Scientific Research Project [16012055-Y]
  2. Key Laboratory of Advanced Textile Materials and Manufacturing Technology (Zhejiang Sci-Tech University), Ministry of Education [2016QN06]
  3. Zhejiang Sci-Tech University (Engineering Research Center of Clothing of Zhejiang Province) [2018FZKF07]
  4. Open Project Program of Key Laboratory of Eco-textiles, Ministry of Education, Jiangnan University [KLET1711]
  5. Fujian Key Laboratory of Novel Functional Textile Fibers and Materials, Minjiang University [FKLTFM1817]
  6. State Key Laboratory of Molecular Engineering of Polymers, Fudan University [K2019-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology provides an effective alternative for tissue engineering scaffold. In this paper, a composite scaffold composed of polylactic acid (PLA) film and 3D printing scaffold was fabricated which could provide structural and mechanical support for tissue application. The effects of PLA film/3D printing composite scaffold on scaffold morphology, average diameter, pore diameter, mechanical properties, themal conductivity, electrical conductivity, and surface hydrophilicity were characterized. PLA film/3D printing composite scaffold had larger thickness, better mechanical and thermal conductivity properties in comparison with pure PLA film and 3D printed scaffold. These results suggested that composite scaffold with relatively good overall performance could be a potential candidate for tissue engineering application.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available