4.5 Article

Abiotic factors influence patterns of bacterial diversity and community composition in the Dry Valleys of Antarctica

Journal

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY ECOLOGY
Volume 96, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/femsec/fiaa042

Keywords

Antarctica; Dry Valleys; abiotic drivers; soil

Categories

Funding

  1. Foundation for Research, Science and Technology of New Zealand
  2. National Science Foundation [ANT 0739648]
  3. New Zealand Marsden Fund [UOW1003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Dry Valleys of Antarctica are a unique ecosystem of simple trophic structure, where the abiotic factors that influence soil bacterial communities can be resolved in the absence of extensive biotic interactions. This study evaluated the degree to which aspects of topographic, physicochemical and spatial variation explain patterns of bacterial richness and community composition in 471 soil samples collected across a 220 square kilometer landscape in Southern Victoria Land. Richness was most strongly influenced by physicochemical soil properties, particularly soil conductivity, though significant trends with several topographic and spatial variables were also observed. Structural equation modeling (SEM) supported a final model in which variation in community composition was best explained by physicochemical variables, particularly soil water content, and where the effects of topographic variation were largely mediated through their influence on physicochemical variables. Community dissimilarity increased with distance between samples, and though most of this variation was explained by topographic and physicochemical variation, a small but significant relationship remained after controlling for this environmental variation. As the largest survey of terrestrial bacterial communities of Antarctica completed to date, this work provides fundamental knowledge of the Dry Valleys ecosystem, and has implications globally for understanding environmental factors that influence bacterial distributions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available