4.7 Article

Optimization of sulfuric acid hydrolysis conditions for preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose from enzymatically pretreated fibers

Journal

CELLULOSE
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 1777-1789

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-016-0897-y

Keywords

Nanocrystalline cellulose; Cellulose nanocrystals; Optimization; Cellulase; Enzymatic treatment; Yield increase

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (Spain) under the BIOSURFACEL [CTQ2012-34109]
  2. Fondo Europeo de Desarrollo Regional, FEDER
  3. BIOPAPmuFLUID [CTQ2013-48995-C2-1-R]
  4. FPI grant [BES-2011-046674]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Preparation of nanocrystalline cellulose (NCC) by 62 and 65 % wt. sulfuric acid hydrolysis of cellulase-pretreated fibers was optimized to obtain the highest yield by applying two statistical plans. At optimal conditions (10 U/g odp cellulase, 25 min hydrolysis, 47 A degrees C, 62 wt.% H2SO4), high yields (a parts per thousand yen80 %) were obtained, including an increase of similar to 9 points due to the enzyme. Optimal conditions produced nanosized particles of around similar to 200 nm with reduced surface charge and sulfur content. The optimization allowed reduction of hydrolysis time by 44 % and increase of yield by more than 10 points compared with results in previous work. The effects of cellulase pretreatment were noticeable even under aggressive hydrolysis conditions, emphasizing its possibilities. Zeta potential and polydispersity index indicated that all studied conditions led to good-quality final products, with values around -50 mV and 0.2, respectively. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analysis confirmed the presence of NCC. Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopic analysis provided evidence that cellulase treatment increased the crystallinity of both cellulose fibers and NCC, as well as fiber accessibility, supporting the other analyses of NCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available