4.7 Article

Disruption of mitochondrial dynamics increases stress resistance through activation of multiple stress response pathways

Journal

FASEB JOURNAL
Volume 34, Issue 6, Pages 8475-8492

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1096/fj.201903235R

Keywords

C; elegans; genetics; mitochondria; mitochondrial dynamics; stress resistance

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01 GM121756]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitochondria are dynamic organelles that can change shape and size depending on the needs of the cell through the processes of mitochondrial fission and fusion. In this work, we investigated the role of mitochondrial dynamics in organismal stress response. By using C. elegans as a genetic model, we could visualize mitochondrial morphology in a live organism with well-established stress assays and well-characterized stress response pathways. We found that disrupting mitochondrial fission (DRP1/drp-1) or fusion (OPA1/eat-3, MFN/fzo-1) genes caused alterations in mitochondrial morphology that impacted both mitochondrial function and physiologic rates. While both mitochondrial fission and mitochondrial fusion mutants showed increased sensitivity to osmotic stress and anoxia, surprisingly we found that the mitochondrial fusion mutants eat-3 and fzo-1 are more resistant to both heat stress and oxidative stress. In exploring the mechanism of increased stress resistance, we found that disruption of mitochondrial fusion genes resulted in the upregulation of multiple stress response pathways. Overall, this work demonstrates that disrupting mitochondrial dynamics can have opposite effects on resistance to different types of stress. Our results suggest that disruption of mitochondrial fusion activates multiple stress response pathways that enhance resistance to specific stresses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available