4.4 Review

Modeling tick vaccines: a key tool to improve protection efficacy

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF VACCINES
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 217-225

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14760584.2020.1745635

Keywords

Tick; tick-borne pathogen; vaccine; model; correlates of protection; antibodies; crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever

Categories

Funding

  1. Spanish program CYTED [118RT0542]
  2. Sealy and Smith Foundation, Galveston, TX, USA [84477]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction: The development of more effective vaccines for the control of tick infestations and pathogen transmission is essential for prevention and control of tick-borne diseases worldwide. Recently, the application of omics technologies has advanced the identification of tick protective antigens. However, other factors such as vaccine formulation and implementation need to be addressed, and tick vaccine modeling will contribute to improve the efficacy of vaccination strategies. Areas covered: In this review, we summarized current information on tick vaccine correlates of protection and modeling, and proposed new approaches to improve vaccine evaluation and implementation using as a proof-of-concept the Hyalomma marginatum-Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus model due to its high mortality rate and potentially growing impact on human health. Expert opinion: Vaccines are required as an effective and environmentally sound intervention for the control of tick-borne diseases affecting human and animal health worldwide. Despite recent advances in the identification of candidate tick protective antigens, research on vaccine formulation and implementation need to be addressed to improve tick vaccine control efficacy. As shown here, modeling of the vaccination strategies against ticks and transmitted pathogens will contribute to vaccine development by guiding the selection of appropriate antigen combinations, target hosts, and vaccination time schedule.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available