4.6 Article

FHL3 differentially regulates the expression of MyHC isoforms through interactions with MyoD and pCREB

Journal

CELLULAR SIGNALLING
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 60-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.10.008

Keywords

Muscle fiber type; FHL3; MyoD; MyHC; CREB

Categories

Funding

  1. Key National High Technology Development Project of China [2011AA100301]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of P.R. China [31001043]
  3. Agricultural Innovation Fund of Hubei Province [2007-620]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2014PY038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In skeletal muscle, muscle fiber types are defined by four adult myosin heavy chain (MyHC) isoforms. Four and a half LIM domain protein 3 (FHL3) regulates myoblasts differentiation and gene expression by acting as a transcriptional co-activator or co-repressor. However, how FHL3 regulates MyHC expression is currently not clear. In this study, we found that FHL3 down-regulated the expression of MyHC 1/slow and up-regulated the expression of MyHC 2a and MyHC 2b, whereas no significant effect was found on MyHC 2x expression. MyoD and phosphorylated cAMP response element binding protein (pCREB) played important roles in the regulation of MyHC 1/slow and MyHC 2a expression by FHL3, respectively. FHL3 could interact with MyoD, CREB and pCREB in vivo. pCREB had stronger interaction with the cyclic AMP-responsive elements (CRE) of the MyHC 2a promoter compared with CREB, and FHL3 significantly affected the binding capacity of pCREB to CRE. We established a model in which FHL3 promotes the expression of MyHC 2a through CREB-mediated transcription and inhibits the expression of MyHC 1/slow by inhibiting MyoD transcription activity during myogenesis. Our data support the notion that FHL3 plays important roles in the regulation of muscle fiber type composition. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available