4.7 Article

Multiphoton signals of a (96 GeV?) stealth boson

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7952-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IFT/UAM-CSIC (Madrid)
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through the project CFTP-FCT Unit 777 [UID/FIS/00777/2013, UID/FIS/00777/2019]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through POCTI (FEDER) [CERN/FIS-PAR/0004/2017, PTDC/FIS-PAR/29436/2017]
  4. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through COMPETE [CERN/FIS-PAR/0004/2017, PTDC/FIS-PAR/29436/2017]
  5. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through QREN [CERN/FIS-PAR/0004/2017, PTDC/FIS-PAR/29436/2017]
  6. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT, Portugal) through EU [CERN/FIS-PAR/0004/2017, PTDC/FIS-PAR/29436/2017]
  7. Spanish Agencia Estatal de Investigacion through the grant 'IFT Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa' [SEV-2016-0597]
  8. MINECO project (ERDF) [FPA 2013-47836-C3-2-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cascade decays of new scalars into final states with multiple photons and possibly quarks may lead to distinctive experimental signatures at high-energy colliders. Such signals are even more striking if the scalars are highly boosted, as when produced from the decay of amuch heavier resonance. We study this type of eventswithin the framework of the minimal stealth boson model, an anomaly-free U(1) Y extension of the Standard Model with two complex scalar singlets. It is shown that, while those signals may have cross sections that might render them observable with LHC Run 2 data, they have little experimental coverage. We also establish a connectionwith a CMSexcess observed in searches for new scalars decaying into diphoton final states near 96 GeV. In particular, we conclude that the predicted multiphoton signatures are compatible with such excess.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available