4.7 Article

Relativistic anisotropic fluid spheres satisfying a non-linear equation of state

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 80, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-020-7956-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CONICYT at the Universidad de Antofagasta, Chile [PFCHA/DOCTORADO-NACIONAL/2019-21190856, ANT-1856, SEM 18-02]
  2. grant Fondecyt, Chile [1161192]
  3. TRC project of the Sultanate of Oman [BFP/RGP/CBS/19/099]
  4. DI-VRIEA through Proyecto Postdoctorado 2019 VRIEA-PUCV

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, a spherically symmetric and static relativistic anisotropic fluid sphere solution of the Einstein field equations is provided. To build this particular model, we have imposed metric potential e2 lambda (r) and an equation of state. Specifically, the so-called modified generalized Chaplygin equation of state with omega =1 and depending on two parameters, namely, A and B. These ingredients close the problem, at least mathematically. However, to check the feasibility of the model, a complete physical analysis has been performed. Thus, we analyze the obtained geometry and the main physical observables, such as the density rho, the radial pr, and tangential pt pressures as well as the anisotropy factor Delta. Besides, the stability of the system has been checked by means of the velocities of the pressure waves and the relativistic adiabatic index. It is found that the configuration is stable in considering the adiabatic index criteria and is under hydrostatic balance. Finally, to mimic a realistic compact object, we have imposed the radius to be R=9.5 mml:mspace [km]. With this information and taking different values of the parameter A the total mass of the object has been determined. The resulting numerical values for the principal variables of the model established that the structure could represent a quark (strange) star mixed with dark energy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available