4.7 Review

The forgotten sons: Warehousing systems for brick-and-mortar retail chains

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 288, Issue 2, Pages 361-381

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.04.058

Keywords

Logistics; Warehousing; Retail chains; Survey

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Warehouses play a vital role in supply chains and have been extensively studied. While much attention has been given to warehousing systems for online retailers catering to consumer needs, this paper focuses on the special requirements of warehouses serving traditional brick-and-mortar stores. The differences in order volume and mix between e-commerce and retail chains are highlighted, along with the need for tailored warehousing systems for each sector.
Warehouses are an inevitable component in any supply chain and a vividly investigated object of research. Much attention, however, is absorbed by warehousing systems dedicated to the special needs of online retailers in the business-to-consumer segment. Due to the ever increasing sales volumes of e commerce this focus seems self-evident, but a much larger fraction of retail sales are still realized by traditional brick-and-mortar stores. The special needs of warehouses servicing these stores are focused in this paper. While e-commerce warehouses face low-volume-high-mix picking orders, because private households tend to order just a few pieces per order from a large assortment, distribution centers of retail chains rather have to process high-volume-low-mix orders. We elaborate the basic requirements within both business segments and identify suited warehousing systems for brick-and-mortar stores (e.g., fully-automated case picking). The setup of each identified warehousing system is described, elementary decision problems are discussed, and the existing literature is surveyed. Furthermore, we identify future research needs. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available