4.7 Article

68Ga-PSMA Cerenkov luminescence imaging in primary prostate cancer: first-in-man series

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-04783-1

Keywords

Cerenkov imaging; 68-Gallium-PSMA intraoperative assessment; Positive surgical margin; Primary prostate cancer

Funding

  1. KWF Kankerbestrijding and Technology Foundation STW [15175]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Currently, approximately 11-38% of prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing radical prostatectomy have a positive surgical margin (PSM) on histopathology. Cerenkov luminescence imaging (CLI) using Ga-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (Ga-68-PSMA) is a novel technique for intraoperative margin assessment. The aim of this first-in-man study was to investigate the feasibility of intraoperative Ga-68-PSMA CLI. In this study, feasibility was defined as the ability to distinguish between a positive and negative surgical margin, imaging within 45 min and low radiation exposure to staff. Methods Six patients were included in this ongoing study. Following perioperative i.v. injection of similar to 100 MBq Ga-68-PSMA, the prostate was excised and immediately imaged ex vivo. Different acquisition protocols were tested, and hotspots on CLI images from the intact prostate were marked for comparison with histopathology. Results By using an acquisition protocol with 150 s exposure time, 8 x 8 binning and a 550 nm shortpass filter, PSMs and negative surgical margins (NSMs) were visually correctly identified on CLI in 3 of the 5 patients. Two patients had a hotspot on CLI from cancer < 0.1 mm from the excision margin. Conclusion Overall, the study showed that Ga-68-PSMA CLI is a feasible and low-risk technique for intraoperative margin assessment in PCa. The remaining patients in this ongoing study will be used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of the technique. Trial registration: NL8256 registered at www.trialregister.nl on 04/11/20109.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available