4.5 Article

Factors Influencing Carbon Stocks and Accumulation Rates in Eelgrass Meadows Across New England, USA

Journal

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
Volume 43, Issue 8, Pages 2076-2091

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-020-00754-9

Keywords

Seagrass; Blue carbon; Carbon sequestration; New England

Funding

  1. Obra Social LaCaixa [LCF/BQ/ES14/10320004]
  2. Government of the Principality of Monaco

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Increasing the protection of coastal vegetated ecosystems has been suggested as one strategy to compensate for increasing carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere as the capacity of these habitats to sequester and store carbon exceeds that of terrestrial habitats. Seagrasses are a group of foundation species that grow in shallow coastal and estuarine systems and have an exceptional ability to sequester and store large quantities of carbon in biomass and, particularly, in sediments. However, carbon stocks (C(org)stocks) and carbon accumulation rates (C(org)accumulation) in seagrass meadows are highly variable both spatially and temporally, making it difficult to extrapolate this strategy to areas where information is lacking. In this study, C(org)stocks and C(org)accumulation were determined at 11 eelgrass meadows across New England, representing a range of eutrophication and exposure conditions. In addition, the environmental factors and structural characteristics of meadows related to variation in C(org)stocks were identified. The objectives were accomplished by assessing stable isotopes of delta C-13 and delta N-15 as well as %C and %N in plant tissues and sediments, measuring grain size and(210)Pb of sediment cores, and through assessing site exposure. Variability in C(org)stocks in seagrass meadows is well predicted using commonly measured environmental variables such as grain size distribution. This study allows incorporation of data and insights for the northwest Atlantic, where few studies on carbon sequestration by seagrasses have been conducted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available