4.5 Article

Human GBP1 does not localize to pathogen vacuoles but restricts Toxoplasma gondii

Journal

CELLULAR MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 8, Pages 1056-1064

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/cmi.12579

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust Career Development Grant
  2. Medical Research Council [MC_UP_1202/12]
  3. National Institute Health [R01AI103197]
  4. MRC [MC_UP_1202/12] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Medical Research Council [1241893, MC_UP_1202/12] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. The Francis Crick Institute [10077, 10076] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Guanylate binding proteins (GBPs) are a family of large interferon-inducible GTPases that are transcriptionally upregulated upon infection with intracellular pathogens. Murine GBPs (mGBPs) including mGBP1 and 2 localize to and disrupt pathogen-containing vacuoles (PVs) resulting in the cell-autonomous clearing or innate immune detection of PV-resident pathogens. Human GBPs (hGBPs) are known to exert antiviral host defense and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, but it is unclear whether hGBPs can directly recognize and control intravacuolar pathogens. Here, we report that endogenous or ectopically expressed hGBP1 fails to associate with PVs formed in human cells by the bacterial pathogens Chlamydia trachomatis or Salmonella typhimurium or the protozoan pathogen Toxoplasma gondii. While we find that hGBP1 expression has no discernible effect on intracellular replication of C. trachomatis and S. typhimurium, we observed enhanced early Toxoplasma replication in CRISPR hGBP1-deleted human epithelial cells. We thus identified a novel role for hGBP1 in cell-autonomous immunity that is independent of PV translocation, as observed for mGBPs. This study highlights fundamental differences between human and murine GBPs and underlines the need to study the functions of GBPs at cellular locations away from PVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available