4.7 Article

Investigation of a modified metal-organic framework UiO-66 with nanoscale zero-valent iron for removal of uranium (VI) from aqueous solution

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 16, Pages 20246-20258

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08381-4

Keywords

Metal-organic frameworks; UiO-66; Nanoscale zero-valent iron; U(VI) adsorption; nZVI reduction; U(VI) removal

Funding

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [11475080]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel composite material (nZVI/UiO-66) of nanoscale zero-valent iron (nZVI) with a functionalized metal-organic framework was synthesized by this study via a coprecipitation method, which was used for the efficient removal of U(VI) in the aqueous solution. The nZVI/UiO-66 had an excellent removal capacity of 404.86 mg g(-1) with an initial U(VI) concentration of 80 mg L-1, 313 K and pH = 6. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM) revealed that nZVI particles were inhomogeneously distributed on the surface of UiO-66. The analysis by the X-ray diffraction (XRD) has further illustrated that the introduction of nZVI did not change the structure of UiO-66. The adsorption process closely followed the pseudo-second-order kinetic and the Freundlich isotherm model. The removal process of U(VI) by nZVI/UiO-66 was spontaneous and endothermic. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) analyses have illustrated that the mechanism was mainly related to adsorption of U(VI) from UiO-66 and reduction of U(VI) by nZVI. The Zr-O bonds were shown to play a vital role in the uranium removal. nZVI/UiO-66 could be recycled. The uptake rate could be maintained at around 80% after 5 cycles of use. Therefore, these results manifested that the nZVI/UiO-66 is a promising sorbent for the efficient and selective removal of U(VI) in radioactive wastewaters.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available