4.8 Article

Primary and Secondary Plastic Particles Exhibit Limited Acute Toxicity but Chronic Effects on Daphnia magna

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 54, Issue 11, Pages 6859-6868

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.0c00245

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Contaminants Advisory Group of Fisheries and Oceans Canada
  2. Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Canada
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  4. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  5. CFI/John R. Evans Leaders Fund [35318]
  6. Eugenie Ulmer-Lamothe Fund
  7. McGill Engineering Doctoral Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanoplastics (NPs; <0.1 mu m) are speculated to be a bigger ecological threat due to their predicted wider distribution, higher concentrations, and bioavailability. Primary NPs are manufactured to be that size, while secondary NPs originate from fragmentation of bigger debris. To date, the long-term impact of NPs in freshwater systems, particularly secondary NPs, is not well-understood. Thus, we employed a freshwater invertebrate, Daphnia magna, to investigate the chronic effects of model primary NPs, fluorescent polystyrene nanospheres (PS-NPs; 20 nm), and water leachate of weathered single-use plastics that contained micro- and nanosized particles. In experiment 1, parent Daphnia (F0) were exposed to 1 and SO mg/L PS-NPs until the production of the neonates (F1) followed by a two-generation recovery. PS-NPs were mainly detected in the intestine and brood chamber in F0 and transferred to F1 and F2. PS-NPs significantly decreased the appendage curling and heartbeat rate in F0 and reduced reproduction in F2. In experiment 2, the plastic leachate also reduced the appendage curling rate but increased growth and reproduction. The results suggest that the acute toxicity of primary and secondary plastic particles is low even at high concentrations, but their chronic and sublethal effects should not be overlooked.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available