4.7 Article

Distribution of organophosphate esters between the gas phase and PM2.5 in urban Dalian, China

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION
Volume 259, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113882

Keywords

Air; PM2.5; OPEs; Gas-particle partitioning; Temporal variation

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China [DUT19LK43]
  2. Open Project of State Key Laboratory of UrbanWater Resources and Environment [QA201945]
  3. Key Laboratory of Coastal Environmental Processes and Ecological Remediation, YICCAS [2018KFJJ06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the concentrations and seasonal variations of organophosphate esters (OPEs) in the gas phase and PM2.5 (particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter <2.5 mu m) in an urban area of Dalian, China, as well as their gas-particle partitioning. The total concentrations of OPEs in the gas phase were in the range of 0.056-6.38 ng/m(3) with the mean concentration of 0.83 +/- 1.24 ng/m(3) , while the concentrations of OPEs in the PM2.5 were in the range of 0.32-3.46 ng/m(3) with the mean concentration of 1.21 +/- 0.67 ng/m(3) . Tris-(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TCIPP) was the dominant congener in the gaseous phase, followed by tris-(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (TCEP) and tri-n-butylphosphate (TNBP), whereas TCEP was the dominant species in the PM2.5 followed by TCIPP and triphenyl phosphate (TPHP). Seasonality was discovered for OPEs in both gas phase and PM2.5 with their concentrations higher in hot seasons, which may due to the temperature-driven emission or gas-particle partitioning. The PM2.5 bound fractions of OPE5 varied significantly between seasons. Tricresyl phosphate (TMPP), tri(2-ethylhexyl) phosphate (TEHP), 2-ethylhexyl diphenyl phosphate (EHDPP), and TPHP were mostly adsorbed onto fine particles, while TNBP, TCEP, TCIPP, and tris(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (TDCIPP) distributed in both gas and fine particle phases. The predicted PM2.5 -bound fractions by K-oa-based model were closer to the measurements for TCIPP, TDCIPP, and TPHP, whereas the predictions by Junge-Pankow model were closer to the measurements for TMPP and tris (2-butoxyethyl) phosphate (TBOEP). However, the predictions of both models cannot accurately match the measured gas-particle partitioning of TNBP and TCEP. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available