4.5 Article

An integrated water quality assessment of Damietta and Rosetta branches (Nile River, Egypt) using chemical and biological indices

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT
Volume 192, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-020-8195-4

Keywords

Chemical properties; Water quality index (WQI); Macroinvertebrates; Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP); Nile Biotic Pollution Index (NBPI); Bioindicator

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rosetta and Damietta are the main branches of the Nile River in Egypt. They provide the required freshwater for different usage for about 20 million people. In the present study, chemical and biological indices were used to assess the water quality and provide a full image of the environmental status in the investigated area. Generally, the chemical parameters, except the dissolved oxygen, were at higher levels in Rosetta Branch when compared to Damietta Branch. Also, Damietta Branch frequently showed the presence of the macroinvertebrate families that are bioindicators of moderate and good water quality. Contrarily, the most resistant species to pollution were frequently recorded in the Rosetta Branch. According to Canadian WQI, the water of Rosetta Branch is classified from marginal to poor for the drinking and aquatic life uses and fair to good for irrigation usage. On the other side, the water quality of Damietta Branch is classified as fair with respect to drinking water and good to aquatic life and irrigation. Based on using macroinvertebrate families as bioindicators, the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) index and the Nile Biotic Pollution Index (NBPI) indicated that the water quality of the Damietta Branch was within moderate class, while Rosetta Branch is categorized from very polluted to extremely polluted classes. The results proved that both BMWP and NBPI have coincided with the CWQI for the drinking and aquatic life indices (p < 0.0001) indicating the validity of BMWP and NBPI to assess the water quality of the investigated area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available