4.6 Review

Predicting substrate exchange in marine diatom-heterocystous cyanobacteria symbioses

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 2027-2052

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/1462-2920.15013

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet) [2018-04161]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. Spanish Government - European Regional Development Fund [BFU2017-88202-P]
  4. Vinnova [2018-04161] Funding Source: Vinnova
  5. Swedish Research Council [2018-04161] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the open ocean, some phytoplankton establish symbiosis with cyanobacteria. Some partnerships involve diatoms as hosts and heterocystous cyanobacteria as symbionts. Heterocysts are specialized cells for nitrogen fixation, and a function of the symbiotic cyanobacteria is to provide the host with nitrogen. However, both partners are photosynthetic and capable of carbon fixation, and the possible metabolites exchanged and mechanisms of transfer are poorly understood. The symbiont cellular location varies from internal to partial to fully external, and this is reflected in the symbiont genome size and content. In order to identify the membrane transporters potentially involved in metabolite exchange, we compare the draft genomes of three differently located symbionts with known transporters mainly from model free-living heterocystous cyanobacteria. The types and numbers of transporters are directly related to the symbiont cellular location: restricted in the endosymbionts and wider in the external symbiont. Three proposed models of metabolite exchange are suggested which take into account the type of transporters in the symbionts and the influence of their cellular location on the available nutrient pools. These models provide a basis for several hypotheses that given the importance of these symbioses in global N and C budgets, warrant future testing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available