4.6 Article

The marble sculptures of General Bulow and Scharnhorst in Berlin: comparative, non-destructive analysis of the weathering state after 12 years of exposure

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL EARTH SCIENCES
Volume 79, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-020-08984-7

Keywords

Marble decay; Ultrasonic methods; Tomography; Non-destructive testing

Funding

  1. Projekt DEAL
  2. BMBF [Marmorbild FKZ: 03VP00292]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After almost 200 years of exposure, the monuments of General Scharnhorst and Bulow have been analysed by means of ultrasound. Both sculptures are made of Carrara marble, both sculptures have been exposed to the same environmental influences and both sculptures are, based on the results of the ultrasonic measurements, in alarming conditions. This statement can be made because of the data of three different measurement investigations within the last 12 years. In this short exposure time, the already low velocities have been reduced by 16.2% and 14.7%. The very low average velocity of 2.8 km/s for the sculpture of General Bulow and a slightly higher average velocity of 3.2 km/s for the Scharnhorst sculpture indicate that both sculptures are in a poor condition, even though a protective winter shelter has been used since 2004. Comparing tomographic velocity measurements performed in 2006 with the measurements made in 2018 was possible and showed that even areas with a thickness up to 90 cm show alarming low ultrasonic velocities down to 2.6 km/s. Even if the circumstances for both sculptures have been the same, they differ in their weathering state. The careful and transparent documentation of all measurements was in this context the most important aspect for the comparative studies. Irregularities in their weathering behaviour of the two statues can be distinguished, allowing an in-depth analysis of the deterioration of the marble.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available