4.8 Article

Air pollution exposure is associated with the gut microbiome as revealed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing

Journal

ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL
Volume 138, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105604

Keywords

Air pollution; Gut microbiome; Whole genome sequencing

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH) [R00ES027853]
  2. Southern California Environmental Health Sciences Center from NIH NIEHS [5P30ES07048, P30ES007048]
  3. Southern California Children's Environmental Health Center from NIH
  4. EPA [P01ES022845, RD-83544101-0]
  5. NIH T32 Environmental Genomics Training grant [T32ES013678]
  6. Hastings Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Animal work indicates exposure to air pollutants may alter the composition of the gut microbiota. This study examined relationships between air pollutants and the gut microbiome in young adults residing in Southern California. Our results demonstrate significant associations between exposure to air pollutants and the composition of the gut microbiome using whole-genome sequencing. Higher exposure to 24-hour O-3 was associated with lower Shannon diversity index, higher Bacteroides caecimuris, and multiple gene pathways, including Lornithine de novo biosynthesis as well as pantothenate and coenzyme A biosynthesis I. Among other pollutants, higher NO2 exposure was associated with fewer taxa, including higher Firmicutes. The percent variation in gut bacterial composition that was explained by air pollution exposure was up to 11.2% for O-3 concentrations, which is large compared to the effect size for many other covariates reported in healthy populations. This study provides the first evidence of significant associations between exposure to air pollutants and the compositional and functional profile of the human gut microbiome. These results identify O-3 as an important pollutant that may alter the human gut microbiome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available