4.7 Article

Experimental investigation of the effect of perforated fins on thermal performance enhancement of vertical shell and tube latent heat energy storage systems

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 210, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2020.112679

Keywords

Latent heat energy storage (LHES); Phase change material (PCM); Perforated fin; Natural convection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A key challenge in the deployment of practical latent heat energy storage systems employing phase change materials is the inherent low thermal conductivity of these materials. The present research is motivated by the need to intensify the buoyancy-driven convection flow in the phase change material to enhance the thermal performance of the system. In this paper, for the first time, the effect of applying perforated fins on the thermal performance enhancement of a vertical shell and tube latent heat energy storage heat exchanger is experimentally investigated and the results are compared with those of the unfinned and solid finned heat exchangers as the base cases. Lauric acid as the phase change material is placed in the shell side and the water is passed through the inner tube. The shells of the heat exchangers were made of transparent Plexiglas tubes to enable the visual comparison of the melting processes. The fins and tubes were made of copper. The melting process of phase change material is studied under different inlet water flow rates (0.5 and 1 l/min) and temperatures (55 and 65 degrees C). The experimental results showed that the time-averaged Nusselt number of the perforated finned heat exchanger is about 30% higher than that of the solid finned heat exchanger due to the minor hindering effect of the perforated fins on the development of the convection flows. Moreover, the total melting time of the perforated finned heat exchanger is about 7% lower than that of the solid finned heat exchanger.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available