4.7 Article

Thermodynamic equilibrium study of altering methane partial oxidation for Fischer-Tropsch synfuel production

Journal

ENERGY
Volume 198, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2020.117394

Keywords

Thermodynamic equilibrium analysis; Partial oxidation of methane; Fischer-tropsch synthesis; Synthetic gas; Carbon elimination

Funding

  1. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia via Transdisciplinary Research Grant [06G52, 06G53]
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Zamalah Scholarship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thermodynamic equilibrium assessment for methane partial oxidation (MPO) and concomitant parallel side reactions was conducted by employing the Gibbs free energy minimization approach in order to study the tuning of syngas H-2/CO ratio appropriate for downstream Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS). The influences of operating conditions including CH4/O-2 ratio (5:1-1:2), pressure (1-50 bar) and temperature (200-1000 degrees C) on MPO performance in terms of reactant equilibrium conversion, product and side product yields and H-2/CO ratio were scrutinized. The results reveal that indirect combustion-reforming pathway was possibly the main contributory factor to the syngas yield during MPO. The lower CH4/O-2 ratios possessed a positive effect on syngas yield. Carbon formation was favored at low temperatures but it could be suppressed as CH4/O-2 ratios reduced at elevated temperatures. Although a rising pressure was disadvantageous for MPO performance but the quantity of carbon deposit was hindered since these processes involved gas volume expansion. A temperature at least of 800 degrees C and CH4/O-2 ratio of 2:1 or 3:2 are the preferable operating conditions for MPO reaction to achieve the carbon-free region meanwhile maximizing the syngas yield with H-2/CO ratio of 2 that appropriate for FTS process. (C) 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available