4.5 Article

Identification of Suitable Areas for Biomass Power Plant Construction through Environmental Impact Assessment of Forest Harvesting Residues Transportation

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 13, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13112699

Keywords

bioenergy; life cycle assessment; geographic information system (GIS); harvesting residues

Categories

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (Notice MIUR) [84/Ric 2012]
  2. Cohesion Fund 2007-2013 of the Basilicata Regional authority
  3. PhD program in 'Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences' at the University of Basilicata

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In accordance with European objectives, the Basilicata region intends to promote the use of energy systems and heat generators powered by lignocellulosic biomass, so the present study aimed to investigate the availability of logging residues and most suitable areas for the construction of bioenergy production plants. The life cycle assessment (LCA) methodology was employed to conduct an environmental impact assessment of the biomass distribution and its transport, and spatial LCA was used to evaluate the impact of regional transport. One cubic meter kilometer (m(3) km(-1)) was used as the functional unit and a small lorry was considered for the transport. The results showed that the available harvesting residues amounted to 36,000 m(3) and their loading environmental impact accounted for 349 mPt m(-3). The impacts of transport (4.01 mPt m(-3)) ranged from 3.4 to 144,400 mPt km(-1) forest parcel(-1), mainly affecting human health (95%) and, second, the ecosystem quality (5%). Three possible sites for bioenergy plant location were identified considering the environmental impact distribution due to feedstock transport. Findings from this research show the importance of considering the LCA of biomass acquisition in site selection and can fill the knowledge gaps in the available literature about spatial LCA.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available