4.5 Article

Characteristics of Radioactive Effluent Releases from Pressurized Water Reactors after Permanent Shutdown

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 13, Issue 10, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13102436

Keywords

nuclear power plant; permanent shutdown; radioactive effluent; decommissioning; Mann-Kendall trend test; source term model

Categories

Funding

  1. Nuclear Safety Research Program through the Korea Foundation Of Nuclear Safety (KOFONS), from the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission (NSSC), Republic of Korea [1605008]
  2. Human Resources Program in Energy Technology of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP), from the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy, Republic of Korea [20184030202170]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to expand our understanding of the characteristics of radioactive effluent from nuclear power plants under decommissioning, which have not been systematically investigated, a series of source term models of radioactive effluent after permanent shutdown has been established based upon theoretical reasoning on the design and operation features of plants and derived in terms of fifteen arguments. Comprehensive radioactive effluent data have been collected and profiled from twenty-eight decommissioning pressurized water reactors, and annual trends of effluent from each plant have been quantitatively analyzed using Mann-Kendall statistical test. In addition, the characteristics of collected effluent data have been qualitatively interpreted based upon arguments newly proposed in this study. Furthermore, potential decreasing of dilution factor for liquid effluent and its safety implications are identified. The source term models and verified characteristics of radioactive effluent after permanent shutdown developed in this study can be used for establishing more efficient discharge monitoring program for decommissioning authorization.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available