4.5 Article

Household Sharing for Carbon and Energy Reductions: The Case of EU Countries

Journal

ENERGIES
Volume 13, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/en13081909

Keywords

household size; household economies of scale; carbon footprint; energy footprint; consumption; European Union; urban; rural; population density; climate change mitigation

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [840454]
  2. UK Research Councils under the Centre for Research on Energy Demand Solutions
  3. EPSRC [EP/R035288/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [840454] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As households get smaller worldwide, the extent of sharing within households reduces, resulting in rising per capita energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. This article examines for the first time the differences in household economies of scale across EU countries as a way to support reductions in energy use and GHG emissions, while considering differences in effects across consumption domains and urban-rural typology. A country-comparative analysis is important to facilitate the formulation of context-specific initiatives and policies for resource sharing. We find that one-person households are most carbon- and energy-intensive per capita with an EU average of 9.2 tCO(2)eq/cap and 0.14 TJ/cap, and a total contribution of about 17% to the EU's carbon and energy use. Two-person households contribute about 31% to the EU carbon and energy footprint, while those of five or more members add about 9%. The average carbon and energy footprints of an EU household of five or more is about half that of a one-person average household, amounting to 4.6 tCO(2)eq/cap and 0.07 TJ/cap. Household economies of scale vary substantially across consumption categories, urban-rural typology and EU countries. Substantial household economies of scale are noted for home energy, real estate services and miscellaneous services such as waste treatment and water supply; yet, some of the weakest household economies of scale occur in high carbon domains such as transport. Furthermore, Northern and Central European states are more likely to report strong household economies of scale-particularly in sparsely populated areas-compared to Southern and Eastern European countries. We discuss ways in which differences in household economies of scale may be linked to social, political and climatic conditions. We also provide policy recommendations for encouraging sharing within and between households as a contribution to climate change mitigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available