4.5 Article

A truncated and dimeric format of an Affibody library on bacteria enables FACS-mediated isolation of amyloid-beta aggregation inhibitors with subnanomolar affinity

Journal

BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 10, Issue 11, Pages 1707-1718

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201500131

Keywords

Affibody molecules; Affinity maturation; Amyloid beta; Bacterial display; Combinatorial protein engineering

Funding

  1. Erling-Persson Family Foundation
  2. Swedish Research council (VR) [621-2012-5336]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The amyloid hypothesis suggests that accumulation of amyloid (A) peptides in the brain is involved in development of Alzheimer's disease. We previously generated a small dimeric affinity protein that inhibited A aggregation by sequestering the aggregation prone parts of the peptide. The affinity protein is originally based on the Affibody scaffold, but is evolved to a distinct interaction mechanism involving complex structural rearrangement in both the A peptide and the affinity proteins upon binding. The aim of this study was to decrease the size of the dimeric affinity protein and significantly improve its affinity for the A peptide to increase its potential as a future therapeutic agent. We combined a rational design approach with combinatorial protein engineering to generate two different affinity maturation libraries. The libraries were displayed on staphylococcal cells and high-affinity A-binding molecules were isolated using flow-cytometric sorting. The best performing candidate binds A with a K-D value of around 300 pM, corresponding to a 50-fold improvement in affinity relative to the first-generation binder. The new dimeric Affibody molecule was shown to capture A(1-42) peptides from spiked E. coli lysate. Altogether, our results demonstrate successful engineering of this complex binder for increased affinity to the A peptide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available