4.7 Article

An association between oil spill clean-up work and cardiovascular disease

Journal

ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY
Volume 194, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110284

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Taean Environmental Health Center operating grant for the Investigation of Long-term Health Effects of the Hebei Spirit Oil Spill, Ministry of Environment, Republic of Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: In December 2007, Taean, South Korea, experienced the largest oil spill in Korean history. After about 10 years of follow-up, we evaluated the long-term effect of the disaster on the cardiovascular health of residents and clean-up workers/volunteers. Objective: We examined the relationship between the duration of oil clean-up work and the risk of incident angina and myocardial infarction (MI). Methods: We used data from a prospective cohort study, the Health Effects Research of Oil Spill (HEROS); we included adult cohort members free from cardiovascular disease who completed at least the first two surveys (n = 1737). At baseline, members reported the number of days they participated in oil clean-up work; during the subsequent surveys, they reported newly diagnosed cases of angina or MI. We fitted a time-varying interval-censored proportional hazard model, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, smoking status, monthly household income, and distance from the affected seashore to residence. Results: The risk of incident angina or MI was greater in those with more than 15 days' exposure; those with 15-59 days showed a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87, 2.06) those with 60-179 days had an HR of 1.31 (0.95, 1.79), and those worked longest (180 or more days) showed the strongest association with a HR of 1.75 (95% CI: 1.17, 2.61). Conclusion: We found that a greater duration of clean-up work was associated with an increased risk of incident angina or MI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available