4.7 Article

Expandable Cardiovascular Progenitor Cells Reprogrammed from Fibroblasts

Journal

CELL STEM CELL
Volume 18, Issue 3, Pages 368-381

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stem.2016.02.001

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (CIRM)
  2. American Heart Association (AHA) [13SDG14580035]
  3. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  4. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [U01HL098179, U01 HL100406, R01HL114948]
  5. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  6. Roddenberry Foundation (RF)
  7. William K. Bowes, Jr. Foundation
  8. NIH
  9. Younger Family Foundation
  10. Whittier Foundation
  11. CIRM

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stem cell-based approaches to cardiac regeneration are increasingly viable strategies for treating heart failure. Generating abundant and functional autologous cells for transplantation in such a setting, however, remains a significant challenge. Here, we isolated a cell population with extensive proliferation capacity and restricted cardiovascular differentiation potentials during cardiac transdifferentiation of mouse fibroblasts. These induced expandable cardiovascular progenitor cells (ieCPCs) proliferated extensively for more than 18 passages in chemically defined conditions, with 10(5) starting fibroblasts robustly producing 10(16) ieCPCs. ieCPCs expressed cardiac signature genes and readily differentiated into functional cardiomyocytes (CMs), endothelial cells (ECs), and smooth muscle cells (SMCs) in vitro, even after long-term expansion. When transplanted into mouse hearts following myocardial infarction, ieCPCs spontaneously differentiated into CMs, ECs, and SMCs and improved cardiac function for up to 12 weeks after transplantation. Thus, ieCPCs are a powerful system to study cardiovascular specification and provide strategies for regenerative medicine in the heart.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available