4.8 Article

Signature motif-guided identification of receptors for peptide hormones essential for root meristem growth

Journal

CELL RESEARCH
Volume 26, Issue 6, Pages 674-685

Publisher

INST BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1038/cr.2016.62

Keywords

peptide hormone; RAM; RGF receptor; crystal structure; RxR motif

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31420103906, 91217305, 91017010]
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology of China [2015CB910200]
  3. State Key Program of the National Natural Science of China [31130063, 31421001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Peptide-mediated cell-to-cell signaling has crucial roles in coordination and definition of cellular functions in plants. Peptide-receptor matching is important for understanding the mechanisms underlying peptide-mediated signaling. Here we report the structure-guided identification of root meristem growth factor (RGF) receptors important for plant development. An assay based on a signature ligand recognition motif (Arg-x-Arg) conserved in a subfamily of leucine-rich repeat receptor kinases (LRR-RKs) identified the functionally uncharacterized LRR-RK At4g26540 as a receptor of RGF1 (RGFR1). We further solved the crystal structure of RGF1 in complex with the LRR domain of RGFR1 at a resolution of 2.6 angstrom, which reveals that the Arg-x-Gly-Gly (RxGG) motif is responsible for specific recognition of the sulfate group of RGF1 by RGFR1. Based on the RxGG motif, we identified additional four RGFRs. Participation of the five RGFRs in RGF-induced signaling is supported by biochemical and genetic data. We also offer evidence showing that SERKs function as co-receptors for RGFs. Taken together, our study identifies RGF receptors and co-receptors that can link RGF signals with their downstream components and provides a proof of principle for structure-based matching of LRR-RKs with their peptide ligands.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available