4.3 Review

Role of Exosomes in the Exchange of Spermatozoa after Leaving the Seminiferous Tubule: A Review

Journal

CURRENT DRUG METABOLISM
Volume 21, Issue 5, Pages 330-338

Publisher

BENTHAM SCIENCE PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.2174/1389200221666200520091511

Keywords

Exosomes; spermatozoa; miRNA; proteins; epididymis; prostasomes

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81960624]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Gansu Province [18JR3RA262, 18JR3RA345]
  3. Scientific Research Project of Gansu Province Traditional Chinese Medicine Administration
  4. Science and Technology Plan Project of Lanzhou Chengguan District [2019JSCX0098]
  5. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [lzujbky-2020-kb24]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Exosomes are extracellular vesicles (EVs) released from cells upon fusion of an intermediate endocytic compartment with the plasma membrane. They refer to the intraluminal vesicles released from the fusion of multivesicular bodies with the plasma membrane. The contents and number of exosomes are related to diseases such as metabolic diseases, cancer and inflammatory diseases. Exosomes have been used in neurological research as a drug delivery tool and also as biomarkers for diseases. Recently, exosomes were observed in the seminal plasma of the one who is asthenozoospermia, which can affect sperm motility and capacitation. Objective: The main objective of this review is to deeply discuss the role of exosomes in spermatozoa after leaving the seminiferous tubule. Methods: We conducted an extensive search of the literature available on relationships between exosomes and exosomes in spermatozoa on the bibliographic database. Conclusion: This review thoroughly discussed the role that exosomes play in the exchange of spermatozoa after leaving the seminiferous tubule and its potential as a drug delivery tool and biomarkers for diseases as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available