4.5 Article

Corn yield and soil nitrogen following winter annual cover crops interseeded into soybean

Journal

CROP SCIENCE
Volume 60, Issue 5, Pages 2667-2682

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/csc2.20185

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality Water Quality Incentive Fund
  2. Hatch ProgramofNational Institute of Food and Agriculture, USDA

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nitrogen demand for corn (Zea mays L.) production is high, and winter annual cover crops (WCC) can be an alternative source of plant-available N. Common corn-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotations in the Mid-Atlantic region leave fields fallow after soybean, providing a niche for WCC. The objective of this research was to evaluate the effect of rye (Secale cereale L.), hairy vetch (Vicia villosa Roth subsp. Villosa), and rye-vetch mixture WCC interseeded into soybean on soil N, corn grain yield, and fertilizer N replacement from cover crops. Eight different field sites were seeded into standing soybeans in Virginia from 2012-2014. The experiment was a split-plot design with WCC species as the main plot in a full factorial arrangement with N rate (0 or 45 kg N ha(-1) as starter fertilization at planting, and sidedress rates of 0, 45, 90, 135, and 180 kg N ha(-1)) as subplots. Maximum corn grain yield following hairy vetch WCC was 0.7 and 0.6 Mg ha(-1) higher than when following rye at 0 and 45 kg ha(-1) starter N, respectively. At one site where hairy vetch biomass was >2 Mg ha(-1), corn grain yield increased beyond levels attributable only to the addition of legume N. Instead of decreasing the sidedress N requirement, optimum N rates with hairy vetch were similar to other WCC, only with higher yields. Hairy vetch WCC generally resulted in higher soil N than other WCC at the V4 stage of corn, but no differences after corn harvest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available