4.3 Article

Simulation of fatigue small crack growth in additive manufactured Ti-6Al-4V material

Journal

CONTINUUM MECHANICS AND THERMODYNAMICS
Volume 32, Issue 6, Pages 1745-1761

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00161-020-00878-0

Keywords

Selective laser melting; Fatigue; Physically small cracks; Crack growth; Defects; Ti-6Al-4V

Funding

  1. Rolls-Royce plc
  2. EPSRC [EP/R004951/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Additive manufacturing (AM) offers design freedom and ability to fabricate parts of complex shapes which are not often possible with the conventional methods of manufacturing. In an AM part, even with optimum build parameters, a complete elimination of defects is not possible and this makes it hard to fully deploy the AM technology to build load bearing parts operating under cyclic loading conditions. Many of these defects are < 1 mm in size and are categorised as 'small cracks'. Local interaction of cracks with microstructural features and closure effects at the wake of the crack tip are some of the factors which make the growth behaviour of small and long cracks different. A crack growth life prediction method, which effectively considers the small crack growth behaviour, has been discussed in this paper. This proposed method includes a detailed finite element-based crack growth simulation using the ANSYS SMART fracture technology. The lifing calculations utilise the modified NASGRO equation and small crack growth data which was obtained from the published long crack growth data, corrected for closure effects. The predicted stress versus number of cycles curves were compared against the fatigue test results for the AM specimens in Ti-6Al-4V material. A good correlation between the predictions and test results suggests that the proposed method can be used to assess the small crack growth life of AM parts where the fatigue effects of cyclic loading can be quite significant.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available