4.7 Article

Genetic Determinants of the Gut Microbiome in UK Twins

Journal

CELL HOST & MICROBE
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 731-743

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.04.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 DK093595, DP2 OD007444]
  2. David and Lucile Packard Foundation Fellowship
  3. Arnold and Mabel Beckman Foundation
  4. Cornell Center for Comparative Population Genomics
  5. National Science Foundation
  6. Wellcome Trust
  7. European Community
  8. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) BioResource Clinical Research Facility and Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  9. Medical Research Council [MR/N030125/1, MR/N01183X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  10. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0514-10027, NF-SI-0507-10228] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies in mice and humans have revealed intriguing associations between host genetics and the microbiome. Here we report a 16S rRNA-based analysis of the gut microbiome in 1,126 twin pairs, a subset of which was previously reported. Tripling the sample narrowed the confidence intervals around heritability estimates and uncovered additional heritable taxa, some of which are validated in other studies. Repeat sampling of subjects showed heritable taxa to be temporally stable. A candidate gene approach uncovered associations between heritable taxa and genes related to diet, metabolism, and olfaction. We replicate an association between Bifidobacterium and the lactase (LCT) gene locus and identify an association between the host gene ALDH1L1 and the bacteria SHA-98, suggesting a link between formate production and blood pressure. Additional genes detected are involved in barrier defense and self/non-self recognition. Our results indicate that diet-sensing, metabolism, and immune defense are important drivers of human-microbiome co-evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available