4.7 Article

Single-Cell Characterization of Viral Translation-Competent Reservoirs in HIV-Infected Individuals

Journal

CELL HOST & MICROBE
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages 368-380

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.chom.2016.07.015

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [HL-092565, AI100663 CHAVI-ID, AI113096, AI118544]
  2. Delaney AIDS Research Enterprise [DARE] [1U19AI096109]
  3. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [137694]
  4. Canadian Institutes for Health Research (Canadian HIV Cure Enterprise)
  5. Canada Foundation for Innovation grant
  6. FRQS AIDS and Infectious Diseases Network
  7. Foundation for AIDS Research [108928-56-RGRL]
  8. FRQS Research Scholar Awards
  9. Canada Research Chair
  10. CIHR [135349]
  11. Saudi Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

HIV cure efforts are hampered by limited characterization of the cells supporting HIV replication in vivo and inadequate methods for quantifying the latent viral reservoir in patients receiving antiretroviral therapy. We combine fluorescent in situ RNA hybridization with detection of HIV protein and flow cytometry, enabling detection of 0.5-1 gag-pol mRNA(+)/Gag protein(+)-infected cells per million. In the peripheral blood of untreated persons, active HIV replication correlated with viremia and occurred in CD4 T cells expressing T follicular helper cell markers and inhibitory co-receptors. In virally suppressed subjects, the approach identified latently infected cells capable of producing HIV mRNA and protein after stimulation with PMA/ionomycin and latency-reversing agents (LRAs). While ingenol-induced reactivation mirrored the effector and central/transitional memory CD4 T cell contribution to the pool of integrated HIV DNA, bryostatin-induced reactivation occurred predominantly in cells expressing effector memory markers. This indicates that CD4 T cell differentiation status differentially affects LRA effectiveness.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available