Journal
COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 143, Issue -, Pages -Publisher
PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106423
Keywords
Group decision making; Hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relation; Worst consistency level; Consensus
Funding
- National Natural Science Foundation of China [71671118, 71971148]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Consistency and consensus using hesitant fuzzy linguistic preference relations (HFLPRs) are two closely related issues for group decision making. However, there are still some gaps that need to be addressed: the normalization methods applied in previous research change the initial information, most approaches modify every element of the original HFLPRs, and the consistency level is uncontrolled in the consensus reaching process. In this paper, two optimization methods are proposed: one that improves the worst consistency index (WCI) and the other that assists groups achieve a predefined consensus level: in which the revised preferences all belong to the original linguistic term set, which makes the revised preferences easier for decision makers (DMs) to interpret and accept. By using the worst consistency level, all possible LPRs in the given HFLPRs are analyzed. After the WCI is controlled, it is then possible to use any part of the preference information from the modified HFLPRs to satisfy the consistency level. Finally, the presented models are validated using numerical examples and extensive comparative analyses.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available