4.7 Article

Effects of sustainability investment and risk aversion on a two-stage supply chain coordination under a carbon tax policy

Journal

COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.cie.2020.106324

Keywords

Low-carbon supply chain; Carbon tax; Sustainability technology; System coordination; Risk aversion

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771138, 71702087, 71804089]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Youth Foundation of Ministry of Education of China [17YJC630004]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province, China [ZR2017MG009]
  4. Special Foundation for Taishan Scholars of Shandong Province, China [tsqn201812061]
  5. Science and Technology Research Program for Higher Education of Shandong Province, China [2019KJI006]
  6. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

While carbon tax policies are widely implemented to reduce emissions, they also increase costs, which has caused controversy in recent years. This new issue motivates us to consider whether a manufacturer should invest in sustainable technology and to study the effects of risk aversion on coordinating a two-stage supply chain comprising of a single manufacturer and a single retailer under a carbon tax policy, which has not been fully investigated in the existing literature. In the mean-variance framework, two optimization models for manufacturer-led decentralized systems with and without technology investment are first developed and then compared to show that the economic and environmental performance of the supply chain can be improved by investing in sustainable technology. An optimization model for a centralized supply chain with technology investment is then solved to derive several coordination conditions. A revenue-sharing contract and a two-part tariff contract are proposed to coordinate the manufacturer-led decentralized system with technology investment. The results show that the former cannot coordinate the supply chain, while the latter can do it only if the retailer is risk-averse. Numerical examples are further offered to illustrate the effects of risk aversion on system coordination under the two-part tariff contract.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available