4.6 Article

Left Atrial End-Diastolic Volume Index as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Outcomes The Heart and Soul Study

Journal

CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 13, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.119.009746

Keywords

cardiovascular diseases; echocardiography; heart failure; left atrium; myocardial infarction

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs (Washington, DC)
  2. NHLBI (Bethesda, MD)
  3. American Federation for Aging Research (New York, NY)
  4. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Princeton, NJ)
  5. Ischemia Research and Education Foundation (San Bruno, CA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The left atrial end-systolic volume index (LAESVI) is a predictor of cardiovascular outcomes and is the recommended measurement of left atrial size. The left atrial end-diastolic volume index (LAEDVI), representing the minimum or residual left atrial volume, has not been fully evaluated as a predictor of cardiovascular events. This study evaluated the predictive power of LAEDVI compared with LAESVI for heart failure (HF) hospitalizations, a composite of HF hospitalizations, myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart disease death, and all-cause mortality. Methods: We measured LAESVI and LAEDVI in subjects without atrial fibrillation or flutter or significant mitral valve disease. Using Cox proportional-hazard models, the association of LAESVI and LAEDVI with the stated outcomes was examined. Results: After a mean of 7.3 +/- 2.6 years of follow-up, there were 147 HF hospitalizations, 118 myocardial infarctions, 45 strokes, 96 heart disease deaths, and 351 deaths from all causes in 938 subjects. When comparing the highest and the lowest quartiles of LAEDVI, there was a near 6-fold increase in the hazard ratio (HR) for HF hospitalization (HR, 5.96; P<0.001). This was higher than what was seen with LAESVI (HR, 4.85; P<0.001). Similar associations were noted for the composite cardiovascular outcome (HR for LAEDVI, 2.97; P<0.001) and for all-cause mortality (HR for LAEDVI, 2.08; P<0.001). In adjusted models, LAEDVI demonstrated equal or better predictive power than LAESVI for HF hospitalization and the composite cardiovascular outcome. Conclusions: LAEDVI is a strong predictor of cardiovascular events in ambulatory patients with stable coronary heart disease and may merit routine use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available