4.3 Article

Development of near-infrared firefly luciferin analogue reacted with wild-type and mutant luciferases

Journal

CHIRALITY
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 922-931

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/chir.23236

Keywords

Akaluc; luciferin analogues; luciferin-luciferase reaction; mutant luciferase; near-infrared bioluminescence; Photinus pyralis luciferase; TokeOni

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [JP15H05948, JP17H06371, JP18K05075]
  2. Adaptable & Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D (A-STEP) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency [AS2614119N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Interestingly, only the D-form of firefly luciferin produces light by luciferin-luciferase (L-L) reaction. Certain firefly luciferin analogues with modified structures maintain bioluminescence (BL) activity; however, all L-form luciferin analogues show no BL activity. To this date, our group has developed luciferin analogues with moderate BL activity that produce light of various wavelengths. For in vivo bioluminescence imaging, one of the important factors for detection sensitivity is tissue permeability of the number of photons emitted by L-L reaction, and the wavelengths of light in the near-infrared (NIR) range (700-900 nm) are most appropriate for the purpose. Some NIR luciferin analogues by us had performance for in vivo experiments to make it possible to detect photons from deep target tissues in mice with high sensitivity, whereas only a few of them can produce NIR light by the L-L reactions with wild-type luciferase and/or mutant luciferase. Based on the structure-activity relationships, we designed and synthesized here a luciferin analogue with the 5-allyl-6-dimethylamino-2-naphthylethenyl moiety. This analogue exhibited NIR BL emissions with wild-type luciferase (lambda(max) = 705 nm) and mutant luciferase AlaLuc (lambda(max) = 655 nm).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available