4.8 Article

3D Printing of Free-Standing O2 Breathable Air Electrodes for High-Capacity and Long-Life Na-O2 Batteries

Journal

CHEMISTRY OF MATERIALS
Volume 32, Issue 7, Pages 3018-3027

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b05360

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  2. Canada Research Chair Program
  3. Canada Foundation for Innovation
  4. Ontario Research Fund
  5. University of Western Ontario
  6. Chinese Scholarship Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Superoxide-based Na-O-2 batteries have been considered as some of the most promising candidates for next-generation energy storage systems due to their high theoretical energy density and energy efficiency. However, to fully realize the advantages of Na-O-2 batteries, the underutilization of air electrodes and poor cycling performance caused by limited O-2 transport in the air electrodes must be addressed. In this work, 3D printing of a reduced graphene oxide (rGO)-based air electrode with a hierarchical porous structure was first demonstrated as being O-2 breathable for Na-O-2 batteries. The unique cathode structure features noncompetitive and continuous pathways for O-2, Na+ ions, and electrons. The macropores provide smooth passages to facilitate O-2 access across the whole electrode, while the micropores between rGO sheets serve as electrolyte reservoirs and accommodate NaO2. The efficiently packed rGO sheets ensure sufficient electronic conductivity within the 3D architecture. Na-O-2 batteries using these O-2 breathable electrodes can achieve a high capacity of 13484.6 mAh g(-1) at 0.2 A g(-1) and a stable cycling performance over 120 cycles with a cutoff capacity of 500 mAh g(-1) at 0.5 A g(-1). The 3D-printed O-2 breathable electrodes evidently demonstrate the importance of a refined balance between electronic conductivity and O-2 transport for high-performance Na-O-2 batteries.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available