4.4 Review

Before the first breath: prenatal exposures to air pollution and lung development

Journal

CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH
Volume 367, Issue 3, Pages 445-455

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00441-016-2509-4

Keywords

Air quality; Prenatal exposure; Respiratory health; Lung function; Fetal development

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Various environmental contaminants are known to impair the growth trajectories of major organs, indirectly (gestational exposure) or directly (postnatal exposure). Evidence associates pre-gestational and gestational exposure to air pollutants with adverse birth outcomes (e.g., low birth weight, prematurity) and with a wide range of diseases in childhood and later in life. In this review, we explore the way that pre-gestational and gestational exposure to air pollution affects lung development. We present results in topics underlining epidemiological and toxicological evidence. We also provide a summary of the biological mechanisms by which air pollution exposure possibly leads to adverse respiratory outcomes. We conclude that gestational and early life exposure to air pollutants are linked to alterations in lung development and function and to other negative respiratory conditions in childhood (wheezing, asthma) that may last into adulthood. Plausible mechanisms encompass changes in maternal physiology (e.g., hypoxia, oxidative stress and inflammation) and DNA alterations in the fetus. Evidence for pre-gestational and gestational effects on the lung is scarce compared with that on early life exposure and further studies are needed. However, the suggested mechanisms are credible and the evidence of pre-gestational and gestational air pollution exposure is robust for adverse birth outcomes. Air pollutants might change lung developmental trajectories of the unborn child predisposing it to diseases later in life highlighting the urgent need for controls on urban air pollution levels worldwide.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available