4.7 Article

Integrin-binding pro-survival peptide engineered silk fibroin nanosheets for diabetic wound healing and skin regeneration

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 398, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.125617

Keywords

Nanosheet; Therapeutic peptide; Diabetic wound healing

Funding

  1. Shenzhen Science and Technology Program [JCYJ20170306141716014, JCYJ20170815153105076]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation of China [51502095, 21604025]
  3. Guangdong Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholars [2016A030306018]
  4. Science and Technology Program of Guangdong [201704020168, 201903010032]
  5. Outstanding Scholar Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory [2018GZR110102001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Diabetics face multiple long-term health complications and diabetic foot ulcers affect approximately 15-20% of the diabetic population. The high disability rate of these patients results in substantial mental burden and economic pressure to the individuals as well as the societies. Here, we report a therapeutic integrin-binding pro survival peptide-engineered silk fibroin nanosheet that can regulate angiogenesis and promote diabetic ulcer healing. The nanosheet with thickness less than 100 nm is highly transparent and flexible, and it can firmly adhere to the biological tissue surfaces in underwater environment. The presence of integrin-binding pro -survival peptide in the nanosheet significantly upregulates the expression of angiogenesis genes and proteins of human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs). In the diabetic mouse model, the peptide-engineered nanosheet reveals significant acceleration of wound closure, epithelialization and granulation tissue formation. These findings suggest that this functional nanosheet could be a promising therapeutic candidate for complicated diabetic ulcer healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available