4.7 Article

Tailoring mulberry-like Fe2O3 architecture assembled by quantum dots on rGO to enable high pseudocapacitance and controllable solid electrolyte interphase

Journal

CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL
Volume 388, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2020.124119

Keywords

Pseudocapacitance; Solid electrolyte interphase; Self-assemble; Fe2O3; Lithium battery

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672165, 51702198]
  2. Postdoctoral Foundation of China [155660, 2016M592897XB]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2018JQ5107]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0308303-03]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Constructing pseudocapacitive materials to combine the battery-level energy density with the cycle life and power density of supercapacitors is a promising energy storage technique. Nanostructuring can greatly induce extrinsic pseudocapacitance, but excessive solid electrolyte interphase (SEI) as the activity surface increases usually results in a poor coulombic efficiency (CE) of battery. Here, we separately investigate the electro-chemical properties of self-assembled Fe2O3 mulberry architecture, quantum dots and bulk particles. Employed as an anode of lithium ion battery, the mulberry architecture retains a dominant pseudocapacitance behavior and high electrochemical activity. It delivers an initial capacity of 1383.8 mAh g(-1), 22.1% higher than Fe2O3 bulk in similar size, in which the pseudocapacitance contribution up to 80.6% at 0.4 mV s(-1). Furthermore, the mulberry architecture decreases the activity surface contacted with electrolyte to enable a limited SEI, achieving a higher coulombic efficiency (initial CE: 80.1%, average CE: 98.9%) well above that of individual quantum dots. This work is expected to inspire the design of novel high-performance anode materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available