4.8 Article

Regulatory T Cell Specificity Directs Tolerance versus Allergy against Aeroantigens in Humans

Journal

CELL
Volume 167, Issue 4, Pages 1067-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.050

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Union 7th Framework Program, project The ONE Study'' Grant [HEALTH-F52010260687]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) grants [SFB650 (TP5, 26), SFB/TR124 (TPA1, Z2), SFB/TR 84 (TPA5)]
  3. Cystic Fibrosis Foundation [SCHEFF15G0]
  4. German Federal Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF) - Project InfectControl, Grant e:Med'' [Fkz 03ZZ0802A, Fkz 03ZZ0813A ART4Fun'', Fkz 01ZX1312A]
  5. priority program of the University of Salzburg Allergy-Cancer-BioNano'' Research Center
  6. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [W1213] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

FOXP3+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) maintain tolerance against self-antigens and innocuous environmental antigens. However, it is still unknown whether Treg-mediated tolerance is antigen specific and how Treg specificity contributes to the selective loss of tolerance, as observed in human immunopathologies such as allergies. Here, we used antigen-reactive T cell enrichment to identify antigen-specific human Tregs. We demonstrate dominant Treg-mediated tolerance against particulate aeroallergens, such as pollen, house dust mites, and fungal spores. Surprisingly, we found no evidence of functional impairment of Treg responses in allergic donors. Rather, major allergenic proteins, known to rapidly dissociate from inhaled allergenic particles, have a generally reduced capability to generate Treg responses. Most strikingly, in individual allergic donors, Th2 cells and Tregs always target disparate proteins. Thus, our data highlight the importance of Treg antigen-specificity for tolerance in humans and identify antigen-specific escape from Treg control as an important mechanism enabling antigen-specific loss of tolerance in human allergy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available