4.6 Review

Structural Designs and in-situ X-ray Characterizations of Metal Phosphides for Electrocatalysis

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 14, Pages 3621-3638

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202000233

Keywords

electrocatalysis; in-situ characterization; metal phosphides; structure; X-ray technique

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0303500]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [U1932201, 21727801, 21902129]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China-Ministero degli Affari Esteri e della Cooperazione Internazionale (NSFC-MAECI) [51861135202]
  4. International Partnership Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [211134KYSB20190063]
  5. Collaborative Innovation Program of Hefei Science Center [2019HSC-CIP002]
  6. Key Laboratory of Advanced Energy Materials Chemistry (Ministry of Education), Nankai University (111 project) [B12015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Electrocatalysis is one of the most attractive technologies for renewable energy storage and conversion to meet global energy demand. Thus it has attracted considerable research efforts for the development of inexpensive and efficient electrocatalysts. Recent research progress has demonstrated that the Earth-abundant metal-based phosphides are attractive materials for efficient electrocatalysis because of attractive features such as tunable structure and high activity. In this Minireview, we summarize the latest research progress of metal phosphide-based materials as efficient electrocatalysts. The synthesis approaches of metal phosphides and the factors that influence structural reconstruction in certain reactions are reviewed and discussed. Specifically, advanced in-situ X-ray characterization techniques for metal phosphide research in the field of electrocatalysis are also highlighted. Finally, the current challenges and future perspectives for these materials are presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available