4.6 Article

On the Catalytic Activity of [RuH2(PPh3)3(CO)] (PPh3=triphenylphosphine) in Ruthenium-Catalysed Generation of Hydrogen from Alcohols: a Combined Experimental and DFT study

Journal

CHEMCATCHEM
Volume 12, Issue 11, Pages 2995-3009

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/cctc.202000159

Keywords

Hydrogen generation; Ruthenium; Carbonyl complexes; Reaction mechanisms; DFT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using density functional theory calculations (at the B97-D2//BP86 level) and measurements of kinetic isotope effects, we explored the mechanism of [RuH2(PPh3)(3)(CO)] (22) in catalytic acceptor-less dehydrogenation of methanol to formaldehyde. 22 is found to exhibit a similar activity as the previously studied [RuH2(H-2)(PPh3)(3)] (1 b) complex. On the computed pathway, eta(2)->eta(1) slippage of Ru-bound formaldehyde prior to decoordination is indicated to be rate-limiting, consistent with the low k(H)/k(D) KIE of 1.3 measured for this reaction. We also explored computationally the possibility of achieving complete dehydrogenation of methanol (into CO2 and H-2), through subsequent decarbonylation of formaldehyde and water-gas shift reaction of the resulting carbonyl complex. Complete pathways of this kind are traced for 22 and for [RuH2(PPh3)(2)(CO)(2)]. An alternative mechanism, involving a gem-diol intermediate (obtained upon attack of OH- to coordinated formaldehyde), has also been investigated. All these pathways turned out to be unfavourable kinetically, in keeping with the lack of CO2 evolution experimentally observed in this system. Our calculations show that the reactions are hampered by the low electrophilicities of the CO and HCHO ligands, making OH- uptake unfavourable. Consequently, the subsequent intermediates are too high-lying on the reaction profiles, thus leading to high kinetic barriers and preventing full dehydrogenation of methanol to occur by this kind of mechanism.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available