4.8 Article

Dissecting Immune Circuits by Linking CRISPR-Pooled Screens with Single-Cell RNA-Seq

Journal

CELL
Volume 167, Issue 7, Pages 1883-+

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.039

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council [ERC-AdG 294325-GeneNoiseControl]
  2. European Research Council Consolidator Grant (ERC-COG) [724471-HemTree2.0]
  3. Israel Science Foundation
  4. Ernest and Bonnie Beutler Research Program of Excellence in Genomic Medicine
  5. Helen and Martin Kimmel award for innovative investigation
  6. Minerva Stiftung research grant
  7. Israeli Ministry of Science, Technology, and Space
  8. David and Fela Shapell Family Foundation
  9. Abramson Family Center for Young Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In multicellular organisms, dedicated regulatory circuits control cell type diversity and responses. The crosstalk and redundancies within these circuits and substantial cellular heterogeneity pose a major research challenge. Here, we present CRISPseq, an integrated method for massively parallel single-cell RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-pooled screens. We show that profiling the genomic perturbation and transcriptome in the same cell enables us to simultaneously elucidate the function of multiple factors and their interactions. We applied CRISP-seq to probe regulatory circuits of innate immunity. By sampling tens of thousands of perturbed cells in vitro and in mice, we identified interactions and redundancies between developmental and signaling-dependent factors. These include opposing effects of Cebpb and Irf8 in regulating the monocyte/macrophage versus dendritic cell lineages and differential functions for Rela and Stat1/2 in monocyte versus dendritic cell responses to pathogens. This study establishes CRISP-seq as a broadly applicable, comprehensive, and unbiased approach for elucidating mammalian regulatory circuits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available