4.7 Review

Long non-coding RNAs in cutaneous biology and keratinocyte carcinomas

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 77, Issue 22, Pages 4601-4614

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-020-03554-3

Keywords

Skin cancer; Basal cell carcinoma; Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma; Epidermis; Wound repair; Ultraviolet radiation

Funding

  1. University of Turku (UTU)
  2. Finnish Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Cancer Society of South-West Finland
  4. Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation
  5. Sigrid Juselius Foundation
  6. Turku University Hospital [13336]
  7. Kymenlaakso Regional Fund of the Finnish Cultural Foundation
  8. Ida Montin Foundation
  9. Instrumentarium Science Foundation
  10. Paulo Foundation
  11. Maud Kuistila Memorial Foundation
  12. University of Turku
  13. Turku University Foundation
  14. Turku University Central Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a largely uncharacterized group of non-coding RNAs with diverse regulatory roles in various biological processes. Recent observations have elucidated the functional roles of lncRNAs in cutaneous biology,e.g.in proliferation and differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes and in cutaneous wound repair. Furthermore, the role of lncRNAs in keratinocyte-derived skin cancers is emerging, especially in cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC), which presents a significant burden to health care services worldwide and causes high mortality as metastatic disease. Elucidation of the functions of keratinocyte-specific lncRNAs will improve understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of epidermal disorders and skin cancers and can be exploited in development of new diagnostic and therapeutic applications for keratinocyte carcinomas. In this review, we summarize the current evidence of functionally important lncRNAs in cutaneous biology and in keratinocyte carcinomas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available