4.7 Article

Dissecting the initiation of female meiosis in the mouse at single-cell resolution

Journal

CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 78, Issue 2, Pages 695-713

Publisher

SPRINGER BASEL AG
DOI: 10.1007/s00018-020-03533-8

Keywords

Single-cell RNA seq; Meiosis initiation; Female germ cells

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFC1003400]
  2. National Nature Science Foundation [31671554, 31970788]
  3. Taishan Scholar Construction Foundation of Shandong Province [ts20190946]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study utilized single-cell RNA sequencing to conduct detailed transcriptome analysis of cell populations involved in mouse female meiosis, revealing different cell populations and germ cell subsets, which helps decipher the molecular pathways driving female meiosis initiation.
Meiosis is one of the most finely orchestrated events during gametogenesis with distinct developmental patterns in males and females. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in this process remain not well known. Here, we report detailed transcriptome analyses of cell populations present in the mouse female gonadal ridges (E11.5) and the embryonic ovaries from E12.5 to E14.5 using single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA seq). These periods correspond with the initiation and progression of meiosis throughout the first stage of prophase I. We identified 13 transcriptionally distinct cell populations and 7 transcriptionally distinct germ cell subclusters that correspond to mitotic (3 clusters) and meiotic (4 clusters) germ cells. By analysing cluster-specific gene expression profiles, we found four cell clusters correspond to different cell stages en route to meiosis and characterized their detailed transcriptome dynamics. Our scRNA seq analysis here represents a new important resource for deciphering the molecular pathways driving female meiosis initiation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available